Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 9 results ...

Apollo, M and Burkacki, D (2024) Key success factors for small design offices in the bidding process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 32–46.

Gamal, A, Nashaat, B, Shahda, M M and Nosier, S R (2024) Ten questions concerning the integration of digital fabrication techniques into the architectural design process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 120–49.

Goncikowski, M (2024) Research by design – determining the form of the initial architectural concept of a skyscraper building in Warsaw. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 1–31.

Lotfabadi, P and Iranmanesh, A (2024) Evaluation of learning methods in architecture design studio via analytic hierarchy process: a case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 47–64.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Architectural pedagogy; analytic hierarchy process; AHP; crit; jury; peer learning; self-learning; design studio;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1745-2007
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2237054
  • Abstract:
    The architecture design studio is a complex pedagogical space and constantly evolving practice that aims to train students in a wide range of skills. The complex nature of the studio makes it a challenging topic to approach as a whole and requires a method that can address its multitude of dimensions all at once. This study explores an adaptation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in evaluating the effectiveness of four learning mediums embedded in architecture studio pedagogy: critiquing (crit), jury, peer learning, and self-learning. A set of four main criteria and twelve sub-criteria were extracted from the program’s learning outcomes to create the hierarchy table. Each criterion/sub-criterion was compared to each of the other criteria using a pair-wise comparison survey. The survey was conducted among fourth-year students and teachers in a department of architecture in Cyprus. The results indicate a complex set of minor differences between students’ and teachers’ responses. The students’ over-dependency on crit as their medium of choice for learning is among the notable findings of the study. Furthermore, the potential for utilizing AHP to develop more comprehensive models for architectural pedagogy is highlighted.

Mahmoudi Motahar, M, Hosseini Nourzad, S H and Rahimi, F (2024) Integrating complete disassembly planning with deconstructability assessment to facilitate designing deconstructable buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 150–67.

Rapheal, O, Adedeji, A, Opeyemi, O and Olugbenro, O (2024) Modelling client and construction firm barriers hindering social client relationship management system implementation in the built environment. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 102–19.

Rizi, R A, Bagherzadeh, F, Schnabel, M A and Bakshi, N (2024) A design methodology to consider occupants’ spatial adjustment and manage view content in adaptive façade design for improving visual comfort. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 168–90.

Tabarroki, S, Nazari, A and Banihashemi, S (2024) Risk stages and factors in architectural design- A structural equation modelling. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 79–101.

Van Nguyen, M and Ha, K D (2024) A corporate social responsibility implementation index for architectural design firms in Vietnam. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 65–78.